-
Website
http://www.davidrisley.com/ -
Original page
http://www.davidrisley.com/2009/07/16/twitter-auto-follow/ -
Subscribe
All Comments -
Community
-
Top Commenters
-
Shazzalive
16 comments · 3 points
-
ChuckRosseel
28 comments · 1 points
-
Leslie, The Freebie Guy
19 comments · 4 points
-
mikecrimmins
40 comments · 5 points
-
Mike CJ
70 comments · 23 points
-
-
Popular Threads
-
69 Services & Resources For ProBloggers
18 hours ago · 9 comments
-
Is Twitter Becoming An Echo Chamber of Marketers?
2 days ago · 19 comments
-
4 Bloggers Doing It Right
5 days ago · 32 comments
-
What My 2-Year-Old Can Teach Us About Life
1 day ago · 7 comments
-
Is It Just Me? [Social Media Gripes]
1 week ago · 37 comments
-
69 Services & Resources For ProBloggers
I don't know what the best route is either. I have contemplated unfollowing every single person I follow to start over. I am afraid that I will offend the people that I enjoy talking to on a daily basis. The other option is to manually go through each follower to unfollow and block, which will take forever.
Great post. I have never ever had an all encompassing auto-follow policy. For awhile I was following everyone that was following me because, like you, I thought that was what was polite (save for those that I could tell were just shoving their wares or lack of clothing in my face). Now though, I only follow those that I feel would benefit my followers to follow. This normally falls into the category of bloggers, technology, business, and or close friends and coworkers. I even go to the extent of blocking people/bots that I don't want to be associated with because of what they represent. I am building a brand and it's important that that remains protected!
Thanks for your insight and may this day provide you success!
Thanks for this post - it made me chuckle... so true, though!
With very few exceptions, I also won't follow anyone who is following more than 300 people. My reasoning there is that they are "twitter deaf" because they follow so many.
I "un-followed" a whole lot of people last February because of this policy. Most of them immediately un-followed me, which tells you what they were about anyway. So now I'm down to 207 followers and only follow 73 of them.
If the person has posted no messages, I will not follow.
If the person has a private feed, I will not follow unless I've read the person's writings elsewhere and like them.
If the person writes exclusively in a language I do not speak, I will not follow.
If the person posts the same message/link over and over, I usually will not follow.
And, needless to say, if the person's content holds absolutely no interest for me, I will not follow. (This not only applies to spammers, but also legitimate people who talk about makeup tips or Eddie Van Halen's guitar prowess or whatever.)
However, I don't get a huge amount of "following" messages per day, so I'm able to keep up with the requests.
Speaking of keeping up, Tony Lawrence has a valid point. I stopped trying to read my entire Twitter stream a year ago, and liken my current activity to dipping a toe in a rushing stream of water. Therefore, it wouldn't make sense for Tony to follow me, if he only wants to follow people who are guaranteed to receive his messages.
And BTW, I like to eat, and I don't mind reading what you had for dinner, if it made you feel good. Or bad even.
I do read my entire feed (but of course it's only 73 people).
I should note that I also dump people for rank stupidity, too much posting and other sins :-)
I mean, sheesh, what's the point of "following" people you don't really follow?
If I follow you, I follow you.
My numbers were soon out of kilter and I've been trying to clean up ever since (when time allows). This cleanup activity is not real high on my list as I will do more important tasks first, like writing some posts.
Since twitter has become a bit of a meat market, I only follow people with similar interest or those who have something that I am interested in learning about.
I get more unfollowers by not following everyone, but how many people can you really follow and be in tune with anyhow?
I follow none of the X-rated webcammers, and they always unfollow after a short period of time, so that issue takes care of itself.
A better balance in my numbers is desirable, but I'll not spend too much time trying to get that accomplished. There is "Pro Blogging" ahead, so that is my main focus.
Also, DM Whacker is a great tool to get rid of all those darn auto-DMs everyone seems to think are useful. I auto delete everything with "follow" in the DM then I can get to my real DMs. Just google DM Whacker and get it - well worth it
Key question is David - if Jenna Jameson followed you on Twitter would you follow her back?!
Another great post!
As I mention on my http://stopautofollow.com site >> Stop Auto Follow, Save Twitter, Save the World ;)
Help spread the message!
Cheers
Imrat
Originally I just thought it was polite to follow those who followed me, but then I realized that they were just following people to get them to follow back so they could have a high follow count....the awareness dawns slowly sometimes :)
Yet I stil won't autofollow. Quality is much more important than quantity. Yet I still feel guilty bc I am not checking out followers fast enough! I truly hope I am not insulting anyway and that they understand. I often tweet, "Please wait for me to follow you back, and don't give up on me, bc I've been very busy lately!" I've come to the conclusion that autofollowing just won't ever be the best for me, and that I will have to deal w not being able to check all followers out. It's sad to me but I have no other option. I do get to most followers though...
Hope that answer helps somehow! Sorry I was so long winded...
krissy knox :)
follow me on twitter: http://twitter.com/iamkrissy
...and yet I think I'm goofy for feeling that way.
I don't have time to follow every link that looks interesting. If I did that, I'd never get any work done at all. But when I have a little time and want to just unwind, then I'll go to Twitter and see if anyone has something interesting to say.
I don't follow anyone who just posts videos, because I'm on a satellite connection and videos mostly don't work. It has to be something vitally interesting for me to even attempt it. Also don't follow anyone who just plays music. I like music, but don't want to sit in front of my computer and listen.
Like you, I've been trying to "weed out" people whose Tweets are never of interest.
It was good a couple of years ago but it just isn't worth the effort anymore. I have lost interest.
I've never auto followed. I check my new followers daily firstly looking at their bio...if it's not related to what I'm into I won't follow, if I'm interested then I check out their latest Tweets. If I see a stream of self promotion, "Get 400 followers daily!", continuous affiliate links and anything else 'annoying' I won't follow them.
Great post and I'm loving your blog. Thanks. :)
My next battle is the auto DM's! Ugh..I think I have over 4k DM's and they are overwhelming. I would like to use it as a more personal way of reaching out, but the replies get buried under the spam!
When someone follows me, I check out their profile - every one. It takes a little time out of my day, but I feel it's worth it.
What does suck on Twitter is when someone follows you and you follow them but then they never respond to anything you say. I don't get that. Isn't that what Twitter is for? Or is it really just link spam from humans?
I would go through my follower list and add pretty much everyone. So kind of a manual auto-follow. Figured I'd see who they were and maybe some interesting interaction would occur.
That quickly got old.
I don't much care about numbers, as I still use Twitter mainly as a social and learning tool. I have a few different groups of people I follow because I want to hear what they have to say, whether to learn from them, because they are into the same hobbies as I am, or just because they are interesting or funny.
But I no longer follow anyone without checking out their profile and last page or two of tweets. The new layout makes it a lot easier, as you can see their last tweet, and can tell right away if it is some bot spamming their cam page or some such thing.
You used auto-follow for a while, checked back in on it and have made some adjustments. I think that's all part of the game. You saved a lot of time, now you have to retweak it and reassess. I don't think it's all about whether automation is all good or all bad. There's value in it, but you still need to keep it balanced out, and that part of the equation will always be a manual process.
Even though I have 1647 people following me, I'm not sure even 10% of those are actually following me because they want to. Infact, I wouldn't be surprised if only 2% of that were actually bothered by what I tweet (and I tweet some proper cool stuff, Heh!). If I go through my followers list, there's a lot just sending out affiliate links in the hope I'll click them because they've started following me (and I guess it works if you're not used to this practice, and you want to find out about the person following you!)
It's a difficult issue to solve, too on a global Twitter scale. I guess by not following them back kind of hides you from any further updates, but, it's still polluting your followers list and count.
First time reading your blog here...nice design :)
It's amazing how much spam circulates on Twitter, which is why I turned off auto-follow (of any type) almost right in the beginning (thankfully).
So while manual approval takes a little time sometimes, it's worth it.
I follow people I know, people I like and people I'd like to know. And people that talk about things that interest me.
I can't be following too many people, I'm a readaholic, I have to read texts when I see them. It's pretty annoying, reading the same text on the back of the toothpaste tube for the millionth time every time I brush my teeth... If I followed more people I'd never get anything done. It's bad enough, already.
I read "Notify me of followup comments via e-mail" fourteen times, while writing this.
Interesting post . . . I actually had forgotten that I had used an autofollow program and wondered why all these unseemly types were following me, duh!
Thanks to someone earlier for posting the http://stopautofollow.com/ link. I'll check it out.
Yesterday I got an email from Jonathan Leger about a new microblogging site he created called http://tipdrop.com. It's relevant, informative, and I think will fast take over Twitter's popularity.
Let me know if you think so, too.
All the best,
Theresa
I appreciate your article because I kind of wondered how people who follow thousands could possibly read them all. I only follow a few 100, and I have developed conversations with these people that have turned into viable business and personal relationships. So while my follow/following is small by Twitter standards, it works in the manner Twitter is intended to -- by extending my network.
Great article, thanks!
dossy.org/twitter/karma/
You will see and sort all the relationships between you and your followers.
I definitely NO LONGER auto follow. You gotta strike up some kinda conversation before I follow you.
And I use the TweetDeck application to monitor a VIP list of people who's tweets I actually read!
And when I do start Tweeting, I'll be following you because I actually enjoy reading your blog. This is my third time back in a couple of weeks, and I'll be adding you to my reader now.
By the same token, I don't manually follow people back just because they follow me. I'll always look at their stream and decide if I'm interested in what they have to say. I don't understand this convention of following people back just because it's "polite." What's the point of following someone if you don't necessarily want to hear what they have to say?
The better the quality of everyone's personal followstream, the better Twitter is for everyone. Social media is about connecting with people, not just "scoring points." Am I wrong?
I'm not trying to be a w***e and get a bazillion followers, I'm after quality before quantity, and if I'm only following 200, and I only have a following of 200, that's just fine with me.
When I first joined I had a few interesting followers I could actually communicate with. Now thats all gone.
Thanks for the post, David. It's time I made a decision about where to go with Twitter.
What's the use of having thousands of followers that don't even read your tweets? I assume that's your point here. :)
I fell into the trap of signing up for one of those "Get thousands of followers" things. And I got 2,000 followers within a week (and followed 2,000). Now, I'm weeding out the ones that I don't read (which is the majority of them), and moving the ones that I do into groups on TweetDeck.
I probably have about 30 to 40 people that I do read (in my two groups), and occasionally I read the other 1,600.
Have a great day:)
Patrick.
Twitter is a failing project.
I guess we all have at one time done the same mistake, and done the auto-follow. And yes with auto-follow you end up getting a lot of unwanted followers that don't care about you. you get like say here 'pornstars' that follow you, follow hatchers (just in there for the numbers and unfollow right after they followed you), and a large amount of these followers is also inactive.
Patrick, I don't think there is an option on Twitter at the moment for turn on/off Auto-Follow. You have to turn this off on the third party site where you set up auto-follow.
I have now focused all my efforts on doing everything manually myself, and that is also where I focus all my coaching on my blog.
I guess David you should come up with some petition that everyone could sign on that are against auto follow programs.
Cheers..
Are Morch
TwtrCoach
Yes, twitter has been viral. No, I do not auto-follow never did. Yes, I stop following people that post every few seconds filling my page with garbage. No, I won't toss it out (not yet). Yes, twitter can be a time waster, it takes time to go through your list to find the ones that you really care about. So question is, why do you follow the ones that you do not care about. Human nature is strange, we all want to connect in some way or another. Hey, I think this comment qualifies as a blog post, hehe. Great day to all!
Whilst I agree on principle that Twitter can be a spammy site, its not as bad as some others I could name.
I do "Auto Follow" but i vet all my followers and i vet those who are not in a particular niche, Like well Blogging for example. I use a number of tools and some have cost me a great deal of money to obtain. But they do work.
I am not into the Huge numbers game that most are and at the last count i had around 1800 followers and i was following about the same. I know i cannot possibly read all my tweets and Dm's or even half but i do care about those in my niche and who are genuinly trying to grow a business.
So I understand your rant and i sympathise. But for now I will continue as I am and hope its enough.
Thanks for sharing your insight.
Kevin
I think I will be following you, though. Thanks
I don´t care about the number of my followers. Better to have a few good followers than 10000 who suck. (sorry:-))
Compare it to real life. Do you talk to 1.000 people a day to find new friends? no.
so let´s get connected in a good way, not by numbers.
Floyd
I have previously auto followed but have also come to the conclusion that it is not productive. I do agree that I need to prune my following list and will when time permits. I don't however care about my followers list. I do care about my followers. And as you point out David, Followers and ones followers list is not one and the same.
I know it's a numbers game, but there has to be a better way!
What you said is very interesting: "Neither side is reading the other! What the hell is the point?"
People hate SPAM but they like nice content.
I've never done autofollow, and now I know I never will. Too much trouble, really; I wouldn't want to autofollow all those porno spambots. Best to let them follow me and then auto-unfollow me.
As for your followers: It's not so much how many followers you have as how many of them listen to you. If they retweet and engage in constructive conversation, great. I wouldn't mind having 3 million followers like @aplusk, most of them fans hanging on my every word. But as for those I follow, 2,000 would probably be my upper limit, especially without groups built into Twitter.
I agree with what you are saying because I've been using auto follow with Tweetlater but like you are saying, it doesn't matter how big your Twitter List is if nobody is reading your tweets...I do go into my Twitter account every once in a while and unfollow people"Like those porn stars" you are talking about and other people that I see are only on there to spam me. I'm going to take more time and go through all my followers and actually check their profile to see what they are all about and then just follow the interesting people and from now on I'm going to turn off the auto follow and start building a more targeted Twitter list of followers by replying back personally to the people that follow me.
Have a great day!
Robert
Every once in a while, you DO have a conversation via Twitter. That's why I'm there. It's not about how many followers I can get.