<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>Blog Marketing Academy - Latest Comments in Debate Over Sponsored Conversations: Get Over It.</title><link>http://davidrisley.disqus.com/</link><description></description><atom:link href="https://davidrisley.disqus.com/debate_over_sponsored_conversations_get_over_it/latest.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Sat, 07 Nov 2009 08:42:11 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Debate Over Sponsored Conversations: Get Over It.</title><link>http://www.blogmarketingacademy.com/sponsored-conversation/#comment-22126461</link><description>&lt;p&gt;All bloggers are mature here and this is the business model which is applied everywhere in every format. Celebrity take money to come in any product shoot than what is this ... this is also selling their face value to common people.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;This is going to last forever.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ZK @ Web Marketing Tips</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 07 Nov 2009 08:42:11 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Debate Over Sponsored Conversations: Get Over It.</title><link>http://www.blogmarketingacademy.com/sponsored-conversation/#comment-21122990</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Waiting for the final FTC verdict. It seems that nobody know what the FTC really want?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Franck Silvestre</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 27 Oct 2009 15:31:38 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Debate Over Sponsored Conversations: Get Over It.</title><link>http://www.blogmarketingacademy.com/sponsored-conversation/#comment-21097636</link><description>&lt;p&gt;This is part of the natural progression of the industry. Did anyone really think that this day would never arrive? I agree with Dave's post here, Get over it.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Jimi Jones</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 27 Oct 2009 07:41:05 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Debate Over Sponsored Conversations: Get Over It.</title><link>http://www.blogmarketingacademy.com/sponsored-conversation/#comment-21091076</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I missed this session at BlogWorld, but have been keeping up on the FTC talk.  I don't see the big deal about disclosing your affiliations.  Most readers are smart enough to realize that if you're promoting a service or product there's a good chance you may be receiving compensation of some sort.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Thanks for the link to the Disclosure.  Been meaning to add a general disclosure page for a while now.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Coree</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 27 Oct 2009 03:31:42 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Debate Over Sponsored Conversations: Get Over It.</title><link>http://www.blogmarketingacademy.com/sponsored-conversation/#comment-21073617</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Caveat emptor boys, that's the name of the game. Unfortunately as PT Barnum said " there is a sucker born every minute" that keeps the scammers healthy.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Richard60</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 26 Oct 2009 22:35:50 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Debate Over Sponsored Conversations: Get Over It.</title><link>http://www.blogmarketingacademy.com/sponsored-conversation/#comment-21073537</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Why is the FTC busting the bloggers balls over this issue when 90% of TV commercials take truth in advertising to new lows - they shine everything up from fast food to insurance companies that pretend they really serve those tasty looking burgers, photographed as prepared by a gourmet chef, and insurance companies that care for the individual - when we all know it's BS. If you have a good product it should speak for itself.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Richard60</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 26 Oct 2009 22:33:33 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Debate Over Sponsored Conversations: Get Over It.</title><link>http://www.blogmarketingacademy.com/sponsored-conversation/#comment-21059171</link><description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;br&gt;It's a pretty high quality problem really, deciding whether or not to accept work sponsoring products.  Very interesting how it's all playing out.  Initially most people seemed against it. Now more people seem to be accepting it.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Dave Doolin</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 26 Oct 2009 17:26:26 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Debate Over Sponsored Conversations: Get Over It.</title><link>http://www.blogmarketingacademy.com/sponsored-conversation/#comment-21058396</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I actually agree with you, it's here to stay, and unavoidable.  It does make sense to have a public conversation on how the FTC's rules impact bloggers --and best practices for brands and bloggers.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Despite that it's here to stay, there are risks to all parties involved.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Jeremiah Owyang</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 26 Oct 2009 17:14:18 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Debate Over Sponsored Conversations: Get Over It.</title><link>http://www.blogmarketingacademy.com/sponsored-conversation/#comment-21034301</link><description>&lt;p&gt;One other thing that was noted in the panel was that it's almost impossible to avoid so-called "sponsored conversations" -- even for those "utopian" bloggers (great term, BTW).&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Almost everything you write, video, or photograph could be construed, in some way, to be sponsored. Jeremiah Owyang did a great job as the moderator pointing this out, right from the start.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Tim_Jones</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 26 Oct 2009 10:24:59 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>